Home / Uncategorized / Oxford University Study Smears Conservative News Sites As ‘Junk News’ – Watching.ml

Oxford University Study Smears Conservative News Sites As ‘Junk News’ – Watching.ml

Liberal media will go an extended technique to painting conservatives as liars — all the best way to England.

A brand new examine on “Junk News Consumption” was launched on February 6 from the University of Oxford as a part of the Computational Propaganda Research Project. In the listing of sources focused and researched as “junk news,” conservative websites reminiscent of Drudge Report, Newsbusters, CNS, MRCTV, Breitbart, the Daily Caller, Free Beacon, LifeNews, National Review, the Red State, and the Federalist had been smeared as “unprofessional,” “counterfeit,” “biased,” and “emotionally driven.”

oxford university pic - Oxford University Study Smears Conservative News Sites As ‘Junk News’ - Watching.ml

The examine got here to the conclusion that “extreme hard right pages — distinct from Republican pages — share more junk news than all the other audiences put together.” Other media retailers, reminiscent of The Guardian, Newsweek, and Mother Jones reported that this examine proved “Fake News Sharing in US is A Rightwing Thing, Says Study.”

Mother Jones wrote that “Trump supporters are among the most prolific social media users spreading fake news and conspiracy content.”

In an interview with the Sacramento Bee, lead researcher Philip Howard stated that “a small chunk of the population isn’t able to talk politics or share ideas in a sensible way with the rest of the population.” He instructed Greg Gordon, “That’s a problem for democracy.”

The goal of the report was to find out “what kinds of social media users read junk news?” By monitoring a core group of 13,500 Twitter customers and 48,000 public Facebook pages, the researchers apparently decided that “extreme hard right pages–distinct from Republican pages–share the widest range of known junk news sources.”

In the summary description of the mission, the researchers wrote” “Drawing on a listing of sources that constantly publish political information and data that’s extremist, sensationalist, conspiratorial, masked commentary, pretend information and different types of junk information, we discover that the distribution of such content material is erratically unfold throughout the ideological spectrum.”

The examine categorized “junk news” as a supply that met three of the next 5 :

“These outlets do not employ the standards and best practices of professional journalism.”

“These outlets use emotionally driven language with … unsafe generalizations and fallacies.”

“These outlets rely on false information and conspiracy theories, which they often employ strategically.”

“These outlets frequently present opinion and commentary essays as news.”

“These outlets mimic professional news media. They counterfeit fonts, branding, and stylistic content strategies.”

About watching

Check Also

vewet 310x165 - Half a Dozen Advisers Leak to Media What Trump Does in Private, Describing “White House in Crisis” - Watching.ml

Half a Dozen Advisers Leak to Media What Trump Does in Private, Describing “White House in Crisis” – Watching.ml

One can all the time count on their enemies to share some heavy …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *