On Thursday’s Morning Joe, MSNBC panelists mentioned a report by The Wall Street Journal that President Trump had tried to start negotiations with Iran over the discharge of American prisoners held there. While none current on the panel opposed the tried negotiations themselves, that didn’t preclude them from utilizing the event to criticize the President.
Host Mika Brzezinski was fast to level out that the President had been “critical of the U.S. Iranian prisoner swap of 2016 under the Obama administration.” Other members of the panel rapidly picked up on this reality and targeted their criticism on the President’s characterization of the negotiations as a “ransom payment.”
“It certainly makes him look like a hypocrite,” Joe Scarborough concluded.
Associated Press White House reporter Jonathan Lemire agreed, “It’s another moment where the President’s actions run contrary to his words.” He went on to recall that the President had known as the Obama-era negotiations “unpatriotic.”
It is unclear whether or not Scarborough and Lemire had been merely lacking the purpose, or in the event that they had been being intentionally obtuse. President Trump’s criticism of the deal negotiated in 2016 was directed particularly on the $400 million cost to Iran by the U.S. Then-candidate Trump alleged that the cash switch – which was not initially disclosed – had been a “ransom payment,” although the State Department denied that the cash was tied to the discharge of American hostages.
Although Brzezinski talked about the switch of funds between the U.S. and Iran whereas offering background for the story, this determine was not introduced up once more for the rest of the section. Instead, the panelists on Morning Joe appeared to deduce from the Trump’s statements in 2016 that his difficulty was with the negotiations themselves, quite than with the deal that was lastly agreed on.
The cost that the President is a hypocrite for making an attempt to barter with Iran implies that he has beforehand claimed to be ideologically against the discharge of American prisoners. Unless the White House finally ends up proposing some kind of cost in trade for these prisoners’ freedom, such a criticism is, at greatest, mistaken.