Home / Uncategorized / Liberal Media Scream ‘F**K Off’ Over ‘Abortion Memo’ in NYT – Watching.ml

Liberal Media Scream ‘F**K Off’ Over ‘Abortion Memo’ in NYT – Watching.ml

The liberal media are all for tolerance – however all bets are off when op-ed columnists query adherence to abortion.

On Thursday, The New York Times printed op-ed columnist David Brook’s “Abortion Memo.” In his “imaginary” memo on “late-term abortions,” a Democratic guide suggested Democratic leaders to finish the occasion’s obsession over abortion.

womanangry 0 - Liberal Media Scream ‘F**K Off’ Over ‘Abortion Memo’ in NYT - Watching.ml

“How much is our position on late-term abortions hurting us?” the guide started, referencing a lately failed try by lawmakers to ban abortion after 20 weeks. “How many progressive priorities are we giving up just so we can have our way on this one?”

He credited professional-life voters for the elections of each Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump to the presidency, and requested the Democrats to think about “what would happen if Roe v. Wade was overturned.”

“The pro-life movement would turn its attention away from national elections,” the imaginary guide careworn. “Single-issue anti-abortion voters would no longer be automatic Republicans. The abortion debate would no longer be an absolutist position on one side against an absolutist position on the other.”

But as an alternative of taking the “memo” as meals for thought, media figures and commentators went berserk on Twitter.

“I’m so fucking done,” started feminist and Guardian columnist Jessica Valenti. “Honestly, FUCK this dishonest bullshit. You know what I’m not willing to tolerate? Dead women. Women being forced to carry dying fetuses.” (Forget that the 20-week ban included exceptions for lifetime of the lady.)

Foreign Policy and New York Times contributor Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian added, “If this doesn’t make any sense to you, let me explain: David Brooks has never been pregnant.” Her Foreign Policy colleague, Shelbie Bostedt, continued, “hey david brooks how about you fuck right off.”

For her half, Aubrey Hirsch, who has additionally written for The New York Times, added, “FUCK YOU, David Brooks.” Similarly, Courtney Enlow, who has appeared in retailers like Bustle and Glamour, continued, “Just…like…fuck you David Brooks” and frightened that her “throbbing vein behind my eye” would possibly “explode.”

Similarly, Shareblue editor Kaili Joy Gray warned, “Fuck you, David Brooks, with a coat hanger.”

Seems to be a theme right here, doesn’t there?

Rewire analyst Imani Gandy hoped “he has to pee every 15 minutes and during his 5th trip to the can, his toilet gets clogged.” She later additionally hoped he “finds a fly in his soup at lunch today,” or, reasonably, an “infinite number of flies.”

Former Guardian author Alana Massey posted an image of a gap in the wall with the caption, “I am invoicing David Brooks for the hole I literally just kicked in my wall reading this.”

For his half, Mother Jones editorial director Ben Dreyfuss concluded, “it’s actually just the laziest dumb shit i’ve ever read in my life.”

Huffington Post columnist Jamil Smith bashed the “rubbish.” Reporting for HuffPo, Laura Bassett referred to the piece as a “waking nightmare.” Another colleague, Emma Gray, charged that “his writing indicates he hardly recognizes that women are full human beings.”

GQ Magazine author Nathaniel Friedman declared that Brooks “has absolutely no idea what he’s talking about here.” His colleague, Jay Willis, supplied $5 to the heroic NYT worker who locks David Brooks out of the CMS,” or content material administration system for posting tales.

Making enjoyable of the current try by professional-life lawmakers to ban abortion after 20 weeks, Allure journal editor Hayley MacMillen known as for a “a ban on David Brooks columns after the first 20 words.”

In disbelief, Nylon author Angela Lashbrook requested “Sorry, but um, is David Br**ks arguing against Roe v Wade?”

Freelance author Stephanie Russell-Kraft‏ attacked the piece as “sexist,” “dismissive,” and simply plain “wrong.” Another freelancer, Carey Purcell, complained, “Now I’ll be up all night, fuming.”

The Root and ThinkProgress author Preston Mitchum “almost stopped breathing from how ridiculous it is,” whereas BitchMedia columnist Britni de la Cretaz was “so angry” she was “shaking.”

New Yorker editor Lauretta Charlton responded with a “memo” about Brooks’ “pie hole” whereas Bleacher Report author Natalie Weiner concluded that Brooks “should not have a job writing op-eds.”

This isn’t the primary time the media have viciously bashed New York Times op-eds towards abortion. Last 12 months, media shrieked “fuck off” one other op-ed mentioned Democrats “must stop being the “Abortion Party.” Just a few months later, feminist media attacked what they known as a “bullshit” professional-life op-ed written by “terrorists.”

About watching

Check Also

trumps phase two for north korea means war watching ml 310x165 - Trump’s ‘Phase Two’ for North Korea Means War - Watching.ml

Trump’s ‘Phase Two’ for North Korea Means War – Watching.ml

Trump made one other not-so-veiled risk in opposition to North Korea yesterday: Speaking at a …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *